![]() Instead, incorporate the information you’ve identified into your own argument making sure to be cognizant of syntax. However, do not copy/paste the annotations into your rough draft. Which one of the sources provides the strongest support for your position? Which one offers a counterargument? Which one(s) provide evidence which gives the argument logos credibility? As you hear the conversation in your head, arrange your annotations to begin to visualize the outline for your rough draft. Next, in selecting how to arrange the sources to create a rough draft, imagine the conversation again. It’s still your position – after all, you chose the sources. ( Smith 54) then Smith must be the first word in my Works Cited: Smith, John. For example, if my in-text citation says this. Even if you had a working thesis beforehand, it’s okay to revise it at this point to more clearly match the debate being presented by your sources. Go through your essay rough draft and make sure that each in-text citation directly matches the Works Cited or Reference page. That response sums up the gist of the argument being discussed and makes clear your position on the topic. Now imagine that your best friend just walked up behind you and asked, “Hey, what are you all discussing?” Your one or two sentence answer is your thesis. The topic about which they are speaking is the information contained in your annotation. ![]() ![]() Once you have done this, arrange the annotations on a table in front of you and imagine that each source is a person standing before you speaking. If your annotated bibliography is printed on continuous pages, cut the annotations apart making certain to leave the bibliographical information with each annotation. Now that you have located sources that either agree or disagree with your position, it’s time to see how those sources inform your thesis. In this exercise, you are becoming part of the academic discussion, or discourse community, on your chosen topic. Now is the time to break out the scissors. While it may be easy for you to state your position and reasons for your argument, you may find it difficult to incorporate your secondary sources into your own draft and still maintain your own voice. Simply try to ensure your first draft roughly tells the story of what you want your main message to be. We discussed this further in the separate post: Deciding what to publish from your PhD work. A researched position paper is simply an argumentative essay in which you take a position on a chosen topic and defend it with secondary sources. Instead of perfecting your first draft, just work to form the rough structure of your paper around whatever you want your key message to be. Now that you’ve completed your annotated bibliography, you may find yourself struggling with how to begin the rough draft of the researched position paper assignment. ![]() 7.7 From Annotated Bibliography to Rough Draft: How to Develop your Position ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |